Credential case · Aerospace enclave · Target Final status

Aerospace enclave Final assessment

Assessment coordination
The case remains viable, but the provider schedule shift narrows the time available before contract option review.

Lifecycle position

Completed stages stay quiet while the current coordination stage remains prominent.

  1. Requirement recorded

    Contracting source established Level 2 need.

    Contracts owner

  2. Assessment scope locked

    Aerospace enclave v3 selected for provider coordination.

    Program owner

  3. Assessment coordination

    Provider readiness session shifted; response plan open.

    Assessment lead

  4. Record external result

    Authorized user records external status, source, and UID.

    Affirming Official

Current implication

Keep the Final-status target, but resolve provider schedule impact before assigning the status-recording package.

2026-07-038 days remaining

Provider readiness session · Assessment coordination

Explain rule

This is a coordination deadline. It helps protect assessment timing but does not record an official CMMC status.

Date basis
Provider readiness session rescheduled to 2026-07-03.
Formula
Use the next externally coordinated assessment milestone.
Rule pack
Continuity planning rule · 2026.06.0
Sources
Provider coordination record; Lifecycle case schedule
2026-08-1349 days remaining

Contract option review · Linked contract milestone · Two pursuits depend on Final status timing

Explain rule

The linked contract date is shown as a consequence of assessment timing. The product does not decide award eligibility.

Date basis
Linked option review milestone recorded as 2026-08-13.
Formula
Compare target Final status timing with linked contract milestone.
Rule pack
2026.06.0
Sources
Contract milestone registry; Lifecycle case target date

Relationship map

The case stays connected to the contract milestone and active scope version used for readiness work.

Case relationship map

These links make the business consequence and assessed boundary available before schedule or result decisions are recorded.

  1. Aerospace enclave Final assessmentAerospace support IDIQ
    Relationship
    Supports contract requirement
    State
    Schedule narrowed
    Implication
    Option review timing is the main schedule risk.
  2. Aerospace enclave Final assessmentAerospace enclave scope
    Relationship
    Uses assessed boundary
    State
    Active v3
    Implication
    Readiness decision is pinned to active scope version v3.

Linked contract consequences

The case view names affected business records without presenting a product inference as confirmed contract language.

Linked contracts and status consequences
ContractRequired statusBusiness dateRisk
Aerospace support IDIQLevel 2 Final2026-08-13Schedule narrowed
Sustainment task orderLevel 2 Conditional accepted2026-09-30Covered

Current stage checklist

Each item has an owner, completion expectation, and explicit relationship to the current lifecycle stage.

  1. Scope version and CAGE codes confirmed for provider package

    Mira Patel

    Complete
  2. Provider readiness session impact reviewed

    Jamal Coleman

    Due Jul 03
  3. Final source packet prepared for status recording

    A. Reyes

    Not started

Assessment records

Coordination details stay separate from externally awarded status facts until an authorized user records the result.

External provider and commercial record

Provider
Northstar Assessment Group
Commercial reference
MSA-2026-17 · Assessment order 004
Provenance
Recorded from provider note

Assessment schedule

Readiness session
2026-07-03 · shifted by provider · manage sessions
Assessment window
2026-07-22 through 2026-07-26
Target status record
2026-08-30

Requests, findings, and exports

References are metadata only in this hosted MVP fixture; source content is not requested or stored.

Assessment coordination register
ReferenceItemOwnerState
REQ-014Provider requested updated system boundary summaryMira PatelPreparing response
FND-002Clarification on managed service provider responsibilityJamal ColemanInternally reviewed